LA comedian and musician Mike Phirman uses
his hands to perform an amazing cover of Sterling Holloway's rendition of
"Trust In Me (The Python's Song)" from Disney's classic 1967 animated
film, The Jungle Book.
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
Friends and a Frame
This is the
object of my affection, Rob. We call our relationship a bromance.
This is my
friend, John, on his back steps with his sculptures. We both love making things
and discussing the process.
I’m going to
get some speech therapy after all. I am keen to learn techniques for improving
my speech because I have doubts from what I have read in the Stuttering
Foundation literature that I will ever be free of it. But, I may be able to
learn to regain some control over my speech.
I’m suddenly
swimming with things to do here while under house arrest. I am reading The Corrections, fixing and finishing
the Peacock dress, I’ve started the Cardinal dress (I am building the form; see below) and I have my lines for The Flame to memorize. This is, for me,
ideal.
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
LOVING the Suttering Foundation
Crying in the
waiting room. I wonder what the other waiters were thinking.
I had a CT scan
late yesterday afternoon. I’d spent all day indoors working on my Peacock dress
so on my way out I picked up my mail and it had my first magazine from the
Stuttering Foundation.
While I was
waiting for the scan, I decided to read the magazine. That’s what made me cry;
I was overwhelmed by that “I’m not alone” feeling.
In particular,
it was an article about Budd Schulberg, the author of the screenplay for On The Waterfront, who stuttered. “He
[Budd] mentioned a conversation with one doctor in which he stated that his own
father, the famous B. P. Shulberg, also stuttered — but as an adult, only under
times of stress.” That’s me.
Also: The
Foundation has made a film called A New
Look at Stuttering. They’ve posted a
promotional video about it on Youtube and all the speakers in the video appear
to be stutterers yet in the video they
are not stuttering! That’s me too!
And another
thing: I’ve said the word “hotel” with the accent on the first syllable for
years. My friend Bruce conjectured that is was due to exposure to the Indian
pronunciation of the word whilst I was in India. But I don’t think that is the
reason.
If I try to say
the word with the accent on the second syllable, I cannot say it. Nothing comes
out. But if I say the word with the accent on the first syllable, it is easy
to say. This is a common trick stutterers use and I was doing it unconsciously.
Learning this
and all the other insights I derived from the magazine were — there’s no other
word for it — exciting! And that is why I cried.
Why do I not
stutter after a seizure? Here’s what I learned from Budd Shulberg: “Master
Tarbell and I were members of the track team and we’d relish sprinting because
afterwards we’d hyperventilate and have totally fluent speech.”
Why am I
confident of my upcoming Flame story-telling that I’m delivering in rhyme and
semi-singing? Budd: “A group of us would walk around in a large circle,
performing like seals, first singing the lines that the therapist gave us, then repeating them in a singsong voice.”
Me again.
In the back of
the magazine are letters to the Foundation from child members. I was touched by
the self-portraits stuttering and the revelations of the letter. But it was
Maddie’s letter that had me bury my face in the magazine while I was waiting
for that CT technician to call me into her laboratory.
“Hi. My name is
Maddie. I’m nine years old. I have something that helps me not stutter. It is
called my robot voice.”
I have named my
voices too: I have Tonto, Rand and Robovoice. Then there’s “my” voice, the
stutterer. Reading that not only does Maddie name her voices, but that we share
a Robot voice just got to me. Imagine: A sixty-eight year old man crying in a
waiting room over a letter by a nine-year-old over kinship.
The kids in the
letters kept referencing “pull out” and “cancellation” in their letters. These
are clearly coping techniques for stutterers that I knew nothing about.
Cancellation: After a stuttering event has occurred, the pws waits a few seconds
and then produces the word again in an easier manner that is slower and
controlled. Another option is to reproduce the stuttered word fluently.
Pullout: PWS must catch themselves in a moment of stuttering and then produce
a pull-out, easing themselves out of the stuttering event. The speaker must not
rush through the rest of the word, but produce it slowly and in a controlled
manner as when canceling a stuttered moment.
What got me
here was the term, “stuttering event.” I had no idea other stutterers were
episodic like me, or that words starting with H or W are hard for all “pws”
(people who stutter).
I am so not alone. Neither am I unique. I am
part of 1% of the population. And I am so incredibly happy to have discovered
the Foundation.
Monday, October 3, 2016
Three-Quarters Done
It's imbalanced. I'll fix that. And perfect symmetrically is impossible for me, but I am happy with it still and when it is on top of the skirt I think it will really be striking — and its entirely tissue paper and tape.
Look Ma, No Pins!
I am thrilled with the progress of the bodice of the Peacock dress. All you see is secure. It is all one p piece. Now I have to finish is, working my way 'round, counter-clockwise. I should be finished this week. But it's really uplifting to see it assembled without all the pins. I'm going to be attaching ribbons to the back of the bodice so that it is tied together at the back. Doing t his makes it adjustable for women of differing sizes.
Next is memorizing my lines for my Flame gig. Then I'll becoming back to the dress; I'll be finishing up with the headpiece, gloves and shoes.
Dress, Socks and Drugs
![]() |
| This is the back of the dress that will have ties so as to fit people of differing sizes. All you can see in this photo is already taped together. The bodice is almost half finished. |
The photos of
my peacock dress consistently fail to please me but the dress is a constant source
of pride and joy. I am addicted to the high of seeing it take shape. But I’ve
been worried about how to get the dress off the mannequin and assembled — I
designed it by pinning almost a hundred and fifty pieces of folded paper onto
the mannequin.
I thought I’d
wait until today, Monday, to go to Dressew and get some invisible tread with
which to sew it all together but I dreaded the both the physical act of the
sewing plus how my uneven manual stitching would ruin the look — making the
paper pucker.
But yesterday,
I started tinkering and by the afternoon I was successfully getting the bodice
off the mannequin, retaining its shape and integrity. Right now, it’s held loosely
together with tape; once I get it off the mannequin I’ll reinforce it on the
back.
I get
positively giddy when I look at the breast-covering part of the bodice. I keep caressing
it because I am so pleased with how the paper takes the shape of the mannequin
and holds it when released from the form. I am beyond pleased with it.
I can hardly
wait to see it together and then worn by someone. I love the juxtaposition of
the feathery skirt and the tightness of the paper bodice.
As I work on
the peacock dress, I am already thinking about the Cardinal dress I plan to
make next.
•
I have thrown
every single pair of socks that I own.
When I
collapsed on the seawall and was taken to the hospital, they did an
electrocardiogram that suggested some kind of (mild) problem with my heart. They
told me to follow up with my own doctor and I did: He ordered another ECG and as
a result of that, today I am getting a CT scan.
Whatever
concerns them may account for my swollen ankles — a condition that is driving
me crazy because the elastic in my socks makes my socks feel like torture
devices. They cut of circulation to my feet so I Googled “non-binding socks”
and discovered “diabetic socks.”
(Please note: That’s how Amazon lists them in
spite of their being no (insulin producing) Islets of Langerhans in socks.)
I ordered a lot
of socks. That aspect of the problem is solved. As for my heart, I’m not
concerned. I feel fine.
•
There’s
interesting medical news coming out of the UK. British scientists are
optimistic about a possible cure for HIV. In a recent clinical trial, a test
patient had no symptoms of the virus following treatment.
Though it’s
still early, those involved are hopeful for a breakthrough:
“This is one of the first serious attempts
at a full cure for HIV. We are exploring the real possibility of curing HIV.
This is a huge challenge and it’s still early days but the progress has been
remarkable.”
The significant
advancement involves combining antiretroviral drugs with two other components:
One that reactivates dormant HIV and another that impels the immune system to
destroy the infected cells”
HIV is able to
hide from the immune system in dormant cells that allows the virus to resist
current therapies. This new treatment causes the virus to emerge from its
hiding places and then triggers the body’s immune system to eradicate it.
Better than
socks!
![]() |
| I loath all things Koons. |
![]() |
| From the US beard competition. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








































