Just like
Sally’s communication with me, Boca’s
response to my submission was a single sentence. I’m also pretty certain it was
copied and pasted into an email to every failing applicant. They’re busy; I get
that, but I’d like to think I’d be more respectful of the artists’ on whose
back my enterprise was built.
I submitted a
written script and a photograph of seven of my hand-made dress properties and
got no information whatsoever other than I lost out.
I’d have
appreciated to know where the failure was. Was my script shite? Or was my
script okay, but outside their mandate? Was it something worthy of their
interest but there were too many other entries that they preferred? They gave
nothing to me; they only spoke to their (lack of) need. I’m disappointed in
that but not in losing out because my emotions are far more invested in my
pleasure with the marble dress.
I started
building the “flare” on its skirt. It’s a structural element that really adds
to the piece’s visual impact. I can build the umbrella but I can’t add it onto
the piece in my condo; I’d never get the whole thing out my door. So it’ll be
built separately and added when the show is installed somewhere.
Plan A: Reserve
the theatre, take another serious crack at the script and send it to the dramaturge/editor
for assessment. If he thinks it has merit, make his revisions and ask other
readers for an assessment. If there’s a consensus that it’s worthy, proceed.
Plan B: Not
make the theatre reservation, finish the dresses (and maybe more) and have an
exhibition of the dresses — with their
letters!
I prefer plan
B. Plan A is a lot of work and money.
Nicki’s
suggestion is that I sell ‘em. Frankly, I can’t imagine anyone wanting one but perhaps
at modest prices — $200 (apron, peacock) - $400 (cardinal, marble, deco) —they could
sell. Were I to sell six, I’d recover my costs and that’s all I want to do. That
was the only reason for the play.
I had these when I was a kid. |
No comments:
Post a Comment